Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a narrowing of the spinal canal in the lumbar region, in which the surrounding osseous and soft tissue structures lead to nerve compression [1] [2]. This condition is either congenital [3] or secondary to a degenerative process, trauma, infection, or surgery [4]. LSS commonly affects the aging population and has a slight predilection for males [1].

The clinical presentation, which is insidious, initially consists of backache but eventually progresses to include worsening pain, fatigue, weakness, and numbness of the leg(s) [1]. Specifically, patients describe symptoms such as tingling, burning, cramping, fatigue, and stiffness of the lower extremities. Moreover, the leg pain is most often bilateral and radiates distally, particularly with exercise [1].

As evident in the majority of cases, neurogenic intermittent claudication is the most predominant sign attributed to LSS [4] [5]. This manifestation is produced and worsened by walking or standing but alleviated with sitting or lying down on the side [1] [4]. Squatting and bicycle riding may also provide relief since flexion of the trunk leads to widening of the lumbar canal [1]. As the disease advances, the patient is likely to adopt a stooped posture [1].

LSS in the younger population [6] may cause radicular symptoms consisting of unilateral neurogenic claudication due to stenosis of the foraminal or lateral recess canal [4]. These patients experience severe leg pain that is worsened with lumbar extension [7].

Complications

Excruciating leg pain, paresthesia, and difficulty with ambulation are all likely sequelae in patients with LSS. Additionally, other possible complications include neurogenic bladder and/or abnormal bowel function [1] [8] and nocturnal leg cramps [9].

Physical exam

On visual inspection, the patient may have a stooped posture. Furthermore, examination of the lower back reveals limited extension [6]. Additionally, a neurological assessment may show absent or reduced ankle reflexes as well as sensory deficits [4].

Patients presenting with the above symptoms should be evaluated by their personal history, clinical picture, physical exam findings, and confirmatory studies. It is important to note that the severity of the clinical presentation does not usually correspond to the degree of stenosis [1].

Imaging

The American College of Physicians (ACP) recommends against routine imaging for low back pain unless there are risk factors for infection, malignancy, or other diseases [10] [11]. However, the traditional workup has included spinal radiography as the initial test. In patients with LSS, this modality is likely to reveal abnormalities such as degenerative changes in the disc or vertebrae, or other disease processes [1].

A spinal computed tomographic (CT) scan provides visualization of the canal and allows for accurate measurements of its diameter [1]. It may demonstrate narrowed canal with impingement by surrounding structures resulting in a "cloverleaf" or the pathognomonic "trefoil" appearance. To improve sensitivity, intrathecal contrast can be used but this is associated with risks.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the preferred study for diagnosis of LSS, is useful in the assessment of the spinal cord and associated soft tissue structures such as the cauda equina, epidural fat, intervertebral discs, etc. [1]. Additionally, this test helps rule out differential diagnoses. Specifically, LSS has characteristic appearances on T1 and T2-weighted images.

Other

Electromyelography is not required but is beneficial in diagnosing neuropathies secondary to demyelination and inflammation [1].

Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis can be conservative or surgical, depending on the severity of the symptoms. Conservative treatments include physical therapy, pain medications, and epidural steroid injections to reduce inflammation and pain. If conservative measures fail and symptoms are severe, surgical options such as laminectomy or spinal fusion may be considered to relieve pressure on the spinal cord and nerves.

The prognosis for patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis varies. Many patients experience relief from symptoms with conservative treatment, while others may require surgery for significant improvement. The outcome of surgery is generally favorable, with many patients experiencing reduced pain and improved mobility. However, the condition may progress over time, and ongoing management may be necessary.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis is primarily caused by age-related degenerative changes in the spine. These changes include the thickening of ligaments, the formation of bone spurs, and the degeneration of intervertebral discs. Other causes can include congenital spinal stenosis, spinal injuries, or conditions such as arthritis.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis is more common in older adults, typically affecting individuals over the age of 50. It is estimated that up to 20% of people over the age of 60 may have some degree of spinal stenosis, although not all will experience symptoms. The condition affects both men and women, with a slightly higher prevalence in men.

The pathophysiology of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis involves the narrowing of the spinal canal, which can compress the spinal cord and nerve roots. This compression can lead to inflammation and irritation of the nerves, resulting in pain and neurological symptoms. The narrowing is often due to degenerative changes such as disc herniation, thickened ligaments, or bone spurs.

While it may not be possible to prevent Lumbar Spinal Stenosis entirely, certain lifestyle modifications can help reduce the risk. Maintaining a healthy weight, staying physically active, and practicing good posture can support spinal health. Avoiding smoking and managing conditions like arthritis can also be beneficial.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis is a condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back, leading to nerve compression and symptoms such as pain and weakness. It is most common in older adults due to degenerative changes. Diagnosis involves clinical evaluation and imaging, while treatment ranges from conservative measures to surgery. The prognosis is generally favorable, especially with appropriate management.

If you suspect you have Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, it is important to discuss your symptoms with a healthcare provider. They can help determine the cause of your symptoms and recommend appropriate treatment options. Managing the condition often involves a combination of lifestyle changes, physical therapy, and possibly medical or surgical interventions to improve quality of life.

1. Alvarez JA, Hardy RH. Lumbar Spine Stenosis: A Common Cause of Back and Leg Pain. Am Fam Physician. 1998;57(8):1825-1834.
2. Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Harris IA, et al. Effectiveness of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Shamji M, ed. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0122800.
3. Ciricillo SF, Weinstein PR. Lumbar spinal stenosis. West J Med. 1993;158(2):171–7.
4. Genevay S, Atlas SJ. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):253-265.
5. Benoist M. The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2002;69(5):450–457.
6. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine. 1992;17(1):1–8.
7. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine. 2000;25(3):389–94.
8. Inui Y, Doita M, Ouchi K, et al. Clinical and radiologic features of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation with neuropathic bladder. Spine. 2004;29(8):869–73.
9. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tsuji T, et al. Nocturnal leg cramps: a common complaint in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine. 2009;34(5):E189–94.
10. Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, et al. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(3):181-9.
11. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):478-491.